by JGalego · LLM Plugin · ★ 5
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 5 |
| Forks | 2 |
| Language | Rust |
| Category | LLM Plugin |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 60/100 |
| Open Issues | 1 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-09 |
| Created | 2026-10-04 |
| Platforms | browser, cli, rust |
| Est. Tokens | ~25k |
Slop stops here 💩✋
These tools work well together with slopcop for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a slopcop alternative? If you're comparing slopcop with other llm plugin tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
The code quality toolkit for the agentic AI era. Find dead code, clones, and scaffolding across 15 languages.
Audits AI-generated frontend and rewrites it so it stops looking AI-made: purple-gradient slop and the "tastef
Governance-first orchestration for Claude Code, Codex, and Gemini CLI — parallel workers, receipts, quality ga
AI-powered code quality analysis using MCP to help AI assistants review code more effectively. Analyze git cha
humanizer, but for code — an agent skill that removes AI-generated code slop: duplicated helpers, try-import f
Skills for AI coding agents — Laravel, PHP, React, TypeScript, testing, security, and code quality.
Explore other popular llm plugin tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: