korean-report-skills — security grade SAFE, quality 64/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 64/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by JangHyun-bin · Agent Tool · ★ 72

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is korean-report-skills safe to install? View the security audit →

About korean-report-skills

korean-report-skills 왜 Claude가 만든 한국어 문서는 어딘가 이상할까 내용은 맞는데 문서로 전달하기가 망설여지는 경험. 그 이유를 다섯 가지로 나누고 각각을 규약으로 구성한 스킬셋입니다. Claude Code · Codex · Cursor 에 적용 가능합니다. → 설치 paper(세로·보고서) · deck(가로·협의자료) — HTML 파일 하나로 구성됩니다. "디자인이 별로예요" 마크다운을 워드에 붙이면 볼품없고, HTML로 제작 할 경우 매번 일관되지 않은 디자인과 구성으로 표현합니다. 제목 크기도, 표 모양도, 여백도 그때그때 달라집니다. → 디자인 시스템을 고정했습니다. 액센트 색 하나, 그림자 없음, 표에 세로 괘선 없음. paper(세로·보고서)와 deck(가로·협의자료) 두 모드뿐이고 섞을 수 없습니다. 같은 요청에 같은 결과가 나옵니다. 전 — 그냥 만들었을 때 후 — 스킬 적용 "문장이 번역체 같아요" 와 가 한 문서에 섞이고, · 같은 번역투가 남습니다. 읽는 사람에게 초안처럼 보입니다. → 치환 목록 115건과 어미 규약. 평서체와 합니다체를 섞지 않고, 필요하면 문서와 커버레터를 분리합니다. 규약 적

agent-skillsclaude-codehtml-to-pdfkatexkoreankorean-typographyreport-generationtechnical-writing

Quick Facts

Stars72
Forks10
LanguagePython
CategoryAgent Tool
LicenseApache-2.0
Quality Score64.1910666648274/100
Last Updated2026-09-04
Created2026-08-10
Platformsclaude-code, python
Est. Tokens~14k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with korean-report-skills for enhanced workflows:

  • skillstead — semantic(0.29)+complementary+rare_topics+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (69%)

korean-report-skills alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a korean-report-skills alternative? If you're comparing korean-report-skills with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • patina by devswha · ⭐ 358

    AI-writing humanizer for KO/EN/ZH/JA

  • moai-cowork by modu-ai · ⭐ 302

    비개발자를 위한 한국 실무 AI 코워커 패밀리 — Claude Cowork·ChatGPT Work에서 /project 한 번으로 시작

  • cowork-plugins by modu-ai · ⭐ 267

    모두의 AI (MoAI) — Claude Cowork & Claude Code 한국 실무 도메인 AI 하네스·플러그인 마켓플레이스. 사업계획서·세무·법률·HR·마케팅·커머스·BI·콘텐츠 도메인 스킬

  • claudepro-directory by JSONbored · ⭐ 217

    HeyClaude (formerly Claude Pro Directory) is a searchable collection of pre-built AI skills, agents, MCP serve

  • ring by LerianStudio · ⭐ 215

    89 skills and 38 specialized agents that enforce proven engineering practices for AI-assisted development. TDD

  • technical-writing by luoling8192 · ⭐ 208

    中文内部技术写作的 agent skill,约束设计文档 / 评审稿 / postmortem / 分享稿场景的语气、句法、结构

More Agent Tool Tools

Explore other popular agent tool tools:

View all Agent Tool tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is korean-report-skills?

korean-report-skills is Claude가 만든 한국어 문서가 어딘가 이상할 때 — 문장 표현과 디자인을 보완하는 Agent Skills. It is categorized as a Agent Tool with 72 GitHub stars.

What programming language is korean-report-skills written in?

korean-report-skills is primarily written in Python. It covers topics such as agent-skills, claude-code, html-to-pdf.

How do I install or use korean-report-skills?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the korean-report-skills GitHub repository at github.com/JangHyun-bin/korean-report-skills. The project has 72 stars and 10 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does korean-report-skills use?

korean-report-skills is released under the Apache-2.0 license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to korean-report-skills?

The top alternatives to korean-report-skills on Agent Skills Hub include patina, moai-cowork, cowork-plugins. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Agent Tool tools