by Juror-AI · MCP Server · ★ 125
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
Cheaper and better Greptile alternative runs on your own github actions.
| Stars | 125 |
| Forks | 37 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 54.4046403357471/100 |
| Open Issues | 16 |
| Last Updated | 2026-09-15 |
| Created | 2026-08-06 |
| Platforms | cli, codex, mcp, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~13k |
These tools work well together with juror for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a juror alternative? If you're comparing juror with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Local codebase intelligence CLI + MCP server for AI coding agents: SQLite code graph, 28 languages, 287 comman
An AI-powered GitHub code review tool that uses LLMs to detect high-confidence, high-impact issues—such as sec
The missing linter and lsp for AI coding assistants. Validate CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, SKILL.md, hooks, MCP. Plug
Open-source Python, TypeScript, and Go SAST with dead code detection. Finds secrets, exploitable flows, and
Node.js/TypeScript MCP server for Atlassian Bitbucket. Enables AI systems (LLMs) to interact with workspaces,
An LLM council that reviews your coding agent's every move
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
juror is Cheaper and better Greptile alternative runs on your own github actions.. It is categorized as a MCP Server with 125 GitHub stars.
juror is primarily written in TypeScript. It covers topics such as ai-agents, ai-code-review, chatgpt.
You can find installation instructions and usage details in the juror GitHub repository at github.com/Juror-AI/juror. The project has 125 stars and 37 forks, indicating an active community.
juror is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.
The top alternatives to juror on Agent Skills Hub include roam-code, Gito, agnix. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: