juror — security grade SAFE, quality 64/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 64/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by Juror-AI · MCP Server · ★ 119

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is juror safe to install? View the security audit →

About juror

Juror is a GitHub Action that asks several frontier models to review each pull request in parallel. It combines duplicate findings into one report and posts the review, merge score, and cost receipt back to GitHub. Juror Cloud This repository also contains , a deployable hosted companion with GitHub and Google sign-in, GitHub App automation, a lean findings and run inbox, isolated Cloudflare Sandbox execution, post-merge staging QA, and transparent Stripe metered billing. The open-source Action and CLI remain independently usable, while repositories

ai-agentsai-code-reviewchatgptclicode-qualitycode-reviewcodexdeveloper-toolsdevtoolsgithub-action

Quick Facts

Stars119
Forks36
LanguageTypeScript
CategoryMCP Server
LicenseMIT
Quality Score64.4680261862476/100
Open Issues17
Last Updated2026-10-06
Created2026-08-06
Platformscli, codex, mcp, node
Est. Tokens~21k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with juror for enhanced workflows:

  • openrabbit — semantic(0.51)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (68%)

juror alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a juror alternative? If you're comparing juror with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • roam-code by Cranot · ⭐ 517

    Local codebase intelligence CLI + MCP server for AI coding agents: SQLite code graph, 28 languages, 287 comman

  • agnix by agent-sh · ⭐ 444

    The missing linter and lsp for AI coding assistants. Validate CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, SKILL.md, hooks, MCP. Plug

  • Gito by Nayjest · ⭐ 436

    An AI-powered GitHub code review tool that uses LLMs to detect high-confidence, high-impact issues—such as sec

  • mcp-server-atlassian-bitbucket by aashari · ⭐ 162

    Node.js/TypeScript MCP server for Atlassian Bitbucket. Enables AI systems (LLMs) to interact with workspaces,

  • sage by usetig · ⭐ 106

    An LLM council that reviews your coding agent's every move

  • claude-emporium by Vvkmnn · ⭐ 82

    🏛 [UNDER CONSTRUCTION] A (roman) claude plugin marketplace

More MCP Server Tools

Explore other popular mcp server tools:

View all MCP Server tools →

Popular TypeScript Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is juror?

juror is Cheaper and better Greptile alternative runs on your own github actions.. It is categorized as a MCP Server with 119 GitHub stars.

What programming language is juror written in?

juror is primarily written in TypeScript. It covers topics such as ai-agents, ai-code-review, chatgpt.

How do I install or use juror?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the juror GitHub repository at github.com/Juror-AI/juror. The project has 119 stars and 36 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does juror use?

juror is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to juror?

The top alternatives to juror on Agent Skills Hub include roam-code, agnix, Gito. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse MCP Server tools