Gito — security grade SAFE, quality 65/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 65/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by Nayjest · Agent Tool · ★ 432

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is Gito safe to install? View the security audit →

About Gito

Gito is an open-source AI code reviewer that works with any language model provider. It detects issues in GitHub pull requests or local codebase changes—instantly, reliably, and without vendor lock-in. Get consisten

aiai-code-analysisai-code-reviewai-code-reviewerai-codingai-coding-assistantai-coding-toolscode-analysiscode-auditcode-quality

Quick Facts

Stars432
Forks40
LanguagePython
CategoryAgent Tool
LicenseMIT
Quality Score65.1854709030341/100
Open Issues58
Last Updated2026-09-05
Created2025-04-30
Platformspython
Est. Tokens~17k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with Gito for enhanced workflows:

  • lucidity-mcp — semantic(0.43)+complementary+rare_topics+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (75%)
  • skylos — semantic(0.29)+complementary+rare_topics+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (69%)
  • roam-code — semantic(0.26)+complementary+rare_topics+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (68%)
  • code-review-graph — semantic(0.21)+complementary+rare_topics+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (61%)

Gito alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a Gito alternative? If you're comparing Gito with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • ai-review by Nikita-Filonov · ⭐ 580

    🚀 AI-powered code review tool for GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket Cloud, Bitbucket Server, Azure DevOps and Gitea —

  • roam-code by Cranot · ⭐ 518

    Local codebase intelligence CLI + MCP server for AI coding agents: SQLite code graph, 28 languages, 287 comman

  • lucidity-mcp by hyperb1iss · ⭐ 89

    AI-powered code quality analysis using MCP to help AI assistants review code more effectively. Analyze git cha

  • pilot-shell by maxritter · ⭐ 2.1k

    Professional context and harness engineering for Claude Code and OpenAI Codex. Build production-grade software

  • brooks-lint by hyhmrright · ⭐ 1.5k

    AI code reviews grounded in 12 classic engineering books — decay risk diagnostics with book citations, severit

  • skylos by duriantaco · ⭐ 828

    Open-source Python, TypeScript, and Go SAST with dead code detection. Finds secrets, exploitable flows, and

More Agent Tool Tools

Explore other popular agent tool tools:

View all Agent Tool tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Gito?

Gito is An AI-powered GitHub code review tool that uses LLMs to detect high-confidence, high-impact issues—such as security vulnerabilities, bugs, and maintainability concerns.. It is categorized as a Agent Tool with 432 GitHub stars.

What programming language is Gito written in?

Gito is primarily written in Python. It covers topics such as ai, ai-code-analysis, ai-code-review.

How do I install or use Gito?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the Gito GitHub repository at github.com/Nayjest/Gito. The project has 432 stars and 40 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does Gito use?

Gito is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to Gito?

The top alternatives to Gito on Agent Skills Hub include ai-review, roam-code, lucidity-mcp. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Agent Tool tools