by HexmosTech · Agent Tool · ★ 1.5k
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 1,470 |
| Forks | 191 |
| Language | Go |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| Quality Score | 65/100 |
| Open Issues | 19 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-10 |
| Created | 2026-02-08 |
| Platforms | gemini, go, vscode |
| Est. Tokens | ~26k |
git-lrc Free, Micro AI Code Reviews That Run on Commit <a href=
Looking for a git-lrc alternative? If you're comparing git-lrc with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
🚀 AI-powered code review tool for GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket Cloud, Bitbucket Server, Azure DevOps and Gitea —
An AI-powered GitHub code review tool that uses LLMs to detect high-confidence, high-impact issues—such as sec
AI coding dream team of agents for VS Code. Claude Code + openai Codex collaborate in brainstorm mode, debate
Open-source AI pair programming for desktop: a Mentor + Executor agent cross-check each other's code to catch
Postman MCP Server — connect AI agents (Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code Copilot, Gemini CLI) to your Postman coll
TalkToFigma: MCP integration between AI Agent (Cursor, Claude Code, Codex) and Figma, allowing Agentic AI to c
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: