by OpenLAIR · Agent Tool · ★ 1.1k
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
npx dr-claw
npm install -g dr-clawTaken from the project's README on GitHub. Check the security audit before running it.
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 1,131 |
| Forks | 126 |
| Language | JavaScript |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| Quality Score | 63/100 |
| Open Issues | 19 |
| Last Updated | 2026-09-17 |
| Created | 2026-02-26 |
| Platforms | claude-code, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~24k |
Dr. Claw: Your AI Research Assistant Full-stack research workspace. <a href="https://github.com/OpenLAIR/dr
These tools work well together with dr-claw for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a dr-claw alternative? If you're comparing dr-claw with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Give an AI a research direction: it runs literature synthesis, gap validation, hypothesis formation and experi
De-Anthropocentric Research Engine — AI-powered academic research automation with deep literature survey, gap
Intelligent Skill routing and workflow orchestration for AI agents — +21.12 pp reward, −29.6% tokens on Skills
🦞+🔬 NanoResearch: The Autonomous AI Research Assistant
AI handles execution, humans own the direction, and every run becomes an inspectable research artifact on disk
AI handles execution, humans own the direction, and every run becomes an inspectable research artifact on disk
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: