Auto-Research-Skills — security grade SAFE, quality 58/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 58/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by brycewang-stanford · Agent Tool · ★ 151

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is Auto-Research-Skills safe to install? View the security audit →

About Auto-Research-Skills

Auto-Research-Skills 自动化研究 技能 与智能体的精选合集 —— 从想法 → 实验 → 论文,全程自动驾驶。 🧩 已收录 3,433 个 skills,分布在 87 个仓库 中 —— 一次克隆拿到整套研究工具箱。 English · 简体中文 ⭐ 重点技能 [Imbad0202/academic-research-skills](https://github.com/Imbad0202/academic-resear

academic-researchagent-skillsai-agentsai-scientistanthropicauto-researchautonomous-agentsawesome-listcausal-inferenceclaude

Quick Facts

Stars151
Forks14
LanguagePython
CategoryAgent Tool
LicenseCC0-1.0
Quality Score58.3170678548146/100
Open Issues1
Last Updated2026-09-07
Created2026-05-27
Platformsclaude-code, python
Est. Tokens~17k

Auto-Research-Skills alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a Auto-Research-Skills alternative? If you're comparing Auto-Research-Skills with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • awesome-academic-research-skills by kael-odin · ⭐ 77

    面向中文用户的学术论文与科研 Agent Skill 每日排行榜 · 自动搜索、过滤并排名 GitHub 上的 Claude Code / Codex / OpenCode 科研 Skill 仓库

  • AlterLab-Academic-Skills by AlterLab-IEU · ⭐ 63

    239 evaluated academic Claude/agent skills across 17 research domains (bioinformatics, data science, clinical,

  • De-Anthropocentric-Research-Engine by Pthahnix · ⭐ 229

    De-Anthropocentric Research Engine — AI-powered academic research automation with deep literature survey, gap

  • de-anthropocentric-research-engine by yogsoth-ai · ⭐ 459

    900+ pure-markdown skills for autonomous AI research, organized as 9 freely-composable packages over a 4-layer

  • claudepro-directory by JSONbored · ⭐ 217

    HeyClaude (formerly Claude Pro Directory) is a searchable collection of pre-built AI skills, agents, MCP serve

  • ai4s-skills by ai4s-research · ⭐ 167

    Open-source agent skills for AI for Science: topic exploration, literature survey, experiments, paper writing,

More Agent Tool Tools

Explore other popular agent tool tools:

View all Agent Tool tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Auto-Research-Skills?

Auto-Research-Skills is A curated hub of autonomous-research skills & agents — from idea to paper, on autopilot. | 自主科研技能与智能体精选库 —— 从灵感到论文全文,全程自动完成。. It is categorized as a Agent Tool with 151 GitHub stars.

What programming language is Auto-Research-Skills written in?

Auto-Research-Skills is primarily written in Python. It covers topics such as academic-research, agent-skills, ai-agents.

How do I install or use Auto-Research-Skills?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the Auto-Research-Skills GitHub repository at github.com/brycewang-stanford/Auto-Research-Skills. The project has 151 stars and 14 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does Auto-Research-Skills use?

Auto-Research-Skills is released under the CC0-1.0 license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to Auto-Research-Skills?

The top alternatives to Auto-Research-Skills on Agent Skills Hub include awesome-academic-research-skills, AlterLab-Academic-Skills, De-Anthropocentric-Research-Engine. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Agent Tool tools