by KoljaB · Agent Tool · ★ 814
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 814 |
| Forks | 80 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| Quality Score | 51/100 |
| Open Issues | 10 |
| Last Updated | 2025-06-17 |
| Created | 2023-06-03 |
| Platforms | python |
| Est. Tokens | ~368k |
Bringing the sci-fi dream of a capable Jarvis-style AI companion into reality. Linguflex 2.0 Born out of my passion for science fiction, this project aims to simulate engaging, authentic, human-like interaction with AI personalities.
Looking for a Linguflex alternative? If you're comparing Linguflex with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
AI agent microservice
LightAgent: Lightweight Python framework for OpenAI-compatible agents with tools, memory, guardrails, tracing,
Introducing the Assistant Swarm. An extension to the OpenAI Node SDK to automatically delegate work to any ass
The Open Assistant API is a ready-to-use, open-source, self-hosted agent/gpts orchestration creation framework
🛠 openai function calling tools for JS/TS
A lightweight, powerful framework for multi-agent workflows and voice agents
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: