by LambdaLabsHQ · Codex Skill · ★ 90
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 90 |
| Forks | 3 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | Codex Skill |
| Quality Score | 61/100 |
| Open Issues | 11 |
| Last Updated | 2026-11-07 |
| Created | 2026-10-04 |
| Platforms | claude-code, cli, codex, gemini, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~17k |
xMatrix Group chat for humans and coding agents. Mention , , , , , , , or in a channel. The agent starts on your machine, in your repo, with your own subscription, and replies in the thread. Website · Quickstart · How it works · Hack on it · Architecture · Releases English · 简体中文 · 日本語 · 한국어 ·
Looking for a xmatrix alternative? If you're comparing xmatrix with other codex skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Self-hosted browser workspace to run coding agents in parallel, steer work as it runs, review diffs, and ship.
Wishes in, PRs out. CLI agent that interviews you, plans the work, dispatches parallel agents in isolated work
Ship features 10x faster. Built In Auto: Memory, K8S Agent & Security (SDD+SDLC) . 😇
A terminal workspace for running multiple AI coding CLIs in parallel
An LLM council that reviews your coding agent's every move
Nirvana-OS engine: ready-to-run agentic operations. One sentence in, finished work out. Source-available engin
Explore other popular codex skill tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: