Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 9 |
| Forks | 3 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | AI Tool |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 61/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-04-17 |
| Created | 2026-04-17 |
| Platforms | python |
| Est. Tokens | ~5k |
降AI率改写Skill，包括知网、维普、Turnitin等AI检测平台。支持中英文，不引入错误、口语或过于复杂的语言，保持可读性和学术规范。官网地址为https://ushallpass.ai/
Looking for a humanizer alternative? If you're comparing humanizer with other ai tool tools, these 1 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
An MCP server, CLI and Skills for reach CNKI.
Explore other popular ai tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: