Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
uv add wiki-llm
pip install wiki-llmTaken from the project's README on GitHub. Check the security audit before running it.
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 65 |
| Forks | 12 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | AI Tool |
| Quality Score | 60/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-05-17 |
| Created | 2026-05-12 |
| Platforms | python |
| Est. Tokens | ~16k |
wiki-llm Turn any document collection into an intelligent wiki — powered by LLM, no code required. Drop your , , files into a folder — manuals, recipes, news articles, procedures, regulations, any textual content. Write a Python config file with your domain rules. Run one command. The wiki is generated, organized, and maintained automatically.
Looking for a wiki_llm alternative? If you're comparing wiki_llm with other ai tool tools, these 3 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Skip to content github / docs Code Issues 80 Pull requests 35 Discussions Actions Projects 2 Security Insights
Skill to talk to Claude about your projects over the phone
.NET MAUI skills for GitHub Copilot and Claude Code
Explore other popular ai tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: