by LucasDuys · MCP Server · ★ 55
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
claude plugin install forge@forge-marketplaceTaken from the project's README on GitHub. Check the security audit before running it.
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 55 |
| Forks | 5 |
| Language | JavaScript |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 67/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-07-15 |
| Created | 2026-03-21 |
| Platforms | claude-code, cli, mcp, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~16k |
One idea in. Tested, reviewed, committed code out. Watch the architecture video · Read the docs The problem You start a feature in Claude Cod
Looking for a forge alternative? If you're comparing forge with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
A verification-first engineering toolkit for Claude Code. Built for senior ICs and tech leads who already know
🏛 [UNDER CONSTRUCTION] A (roman) claude plugin marketplace
📜 An MCP server for conversation history search and retrieval in Claude Code
Open source AI coding platform with Web IDE, multi-agent system, 37+ tools, MCP protocol. MIT licensed.
Automated loop driver, slash commands, council automation, MCP browser bridge, and portfolio governance for Cl
MCP Fusion - The framework for AI-native MCP servers.
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: