paper-lifecycle — security grade SAFE, quality 42/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 42/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by M1n-n9 · Codex Skill · ★ 621

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is paper-lifecycle safe to install? View the security audit →

About paper-lifecycle

Paper Lifecycle Skills 中文 · English 中文 Switch to English 现在是一个科研写作 skills suite。根目录只做项目说明,真正可安装、可调用的 skill 是两个平级目录: 两个 Skill Review Revision 路径: 用途:对已有论文、初稿、被拒稿件或已有明确方向的 idea 做审稿式体检和修改规划。它会检查问题是否真实,insight 是否成立,novelty 是否站得住,method 是否服务于机制,experiments 是否支撑 claim,writing 是否把审稿人带到正确理解。 适合: 论文 PDF、LaTeX、Word 或 Markdown 初稿诊断 A 会、期刊或 workshop 投稿前 checklist introduction、related work、method、experiments 等逐节修改 theory、statistics、reproducibility、figures/tables 审计 调用示例: Rebuttal Response 路径: 用途:专门处理审稿意见和 rebuttal。它不是泛泛润色回复,而是把 reviews 拆成 AC 能判断的证据包:哪些 concern 会影响接收,哪些 reviewer 可能被说服,优先补哪些证据,怎样写 AC-facing summary,怎样逐 reviewer 回复,怎样纠正事实错误但不显得攻击 reviewer。 适合: 收到 reviews 后做问题分类和优先级排序 写 AC-facing executive summary 回复 novelty、baseline、实验设置、方法动机、scope、事实误解 检查 rebuttal 语气,删掉过度道歉、硬刚、空泛承诺 生成 rebuttal checklist 和 camera-ready promise list 调用示例: C

Quick Facts

Stars621
Forks38
CategoryCodex Skill
Quality Score41.6612864380424/100
Last Updated2026-06-16
Created2026-06-15
Platformscodex
Est. Tokens~15k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with paper-lifecycle for enhanced workflows:

paper-lifecycle alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a paper-lifecycle alternative? If you're comparing paper-lifecycle with other codex skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • Claude-to-IM-skill by op7418 · ⭐ 2.9k

    Bridge Claude Code / Codex to IM platforms — chat with AI coding agents from Telegram, Discord, or Feishu/Lark

  • pi-skills by badlogic · ⭐ 2.5k

    Skills for pi coding agent (compatible with Claude Code and Codex CLI)

  • agent-skill-creator by FrancyJGLisboa · ⭐ 2.4k

    Build tested agent skills and govern their lifecycle through a user-defined marketplace: evidence, discovery,

  • learning-opportunities by DrCatHicks · ⭐ 2.4k

    A Claude or Codex skill for deliberate skill development during AI-assisted coding

  • nano-banana-pro-prompts-recommend-skill by YouMind-OpenLab · ⭐ 1.9k

    AI skill for OpenClaw & Claude Code — recommend from 10000+ Nano Banana Pro (Gemini) image prompts. Smart sear

  • skillkit by rohitg00 · ⭐ 1.5k

    Supercharge AI coding agents with portable skills. Install, translate & share skills across Claude Code, Curso

More Codex Skill Tools

Explore other popular codex skill tools:

View all Codex Skill tools →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is paper-lifecycle?

paper-lifecycle is Codex skill for full academic paper lifecycle analysis and revision. It is categorized as a Codex Skill with 621 GitHub stars.

How do I install or use paper-lifecycle?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the paper-lifecycle GitHub repository at github.com/M1n-n9/paper-lifecycle. The project has 621 stars and 38 forks, indicating an active community.

What are the best alternatives to paper-lifecycle?

The top alternatives to paper-lifecycle on Agent Skills Hub include Claude-to-IM-skill, pi-skills, agent-skill-creator. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Codex Skill tools