Flagged: sudo usage. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
by skyhook-io · MCP Server · ★ 3.4k
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
🔒 Is radar safe to install? View the security audit →
Radar Modern Kubernetes visibility. Local-first. No account. No cloud dependency. Blazing Fast. 🌐 radarhq.io · Docs · Releases Topology, event timeline, and service traffic — plus resource browsing, Helm management, and GitOps support for FluxCD and ArgoCD. [
Open-source MCP server for LinkedIn. Give Claude and any MCP-compatible AI agent access to profiles, companies
MCP Aggregator, Orchestrator, Middleware, Gateway in one docker
Open-source persistent memory for AI agent pipelines (LangGraph, CrewAI, AutoGen) and Claude. REST API + knowl
Create AI Agents in a No-Code Visual Builder or TypeScript SDK with full 2-way sync. For shipping AI assistant
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
radar is The missing open-source Kubernetes UI with a built-in MCP server for AI agents. See what's broken, why, and what changed. Issues, Topology, event timeline, Helm, GitOps, live service traffic, and clus. It is categorized as a MCP Server with 3.4k GitHub stars.
radar is primarily written in Go. It covers topics such as ai-agents, argocd, cloud-native.
You can find installation instructions and usage details in the radar GitHub repository at github.com/skyhook-io/radar. The project has 3.4k stars and 217 forks, indicating an active community.
radar is released under the Apache-2.0 license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.
The top alternatives to radar on Agent Skills Hub include MCPJungle, tyk, linkedin-mcp-server. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: