by Matthew0822 · Agent Tool · ★ 171
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 171 |
| Forks | 18 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 71/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-09-14 |
| Created | 2026-09-14 |
| Platforms | cli, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~19k |
ToolReplay ToolReplay audits a recorded transcript of an AI agent's tool calls and reports where the session was non-deterministic, redundant, or outside its declared permissions. Here is the tool working, right now, on the dirty sample that ships in this repository.
Looking for a ToolReplay alternative? If you're comparing ToolReplay with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
A test runner for agentskills.io-style AI agent skills
Local codebase intelligence CLI + MCP server for AI coding agents: SQLite code graph, 28 languages, 287 comman
Context cleaning for Claude Code — prune bloated sessions, protect Agent Teams from context loss, auto-guard w
Instill trust in your agent evals.
The website QA tool for your coding agent. 310+ audit rules across SEO, performance, security, accessibility a
🐤 Less permission fatigue, more momentum. Dippy knows what’s safe to run and keeps Claude on track when plans
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: