Dippy — security grade SAFE, quality 70/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 70/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by ldayton · Claude Skill · ★ 242

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is Dippy safe to install? View the security audit →

About Dippy

🐤 Dippy Because ls shouldn't need approval Stop the permission fatigue. Claude Code asks for approval on every , , and - destroying your flow state. You check Slack, come back, and your assistant's just sitting there waiting. Dippy is a shell command hook that auto-approves safe commands while still prompting for anything destructive. When it blocks, your custom deny messages can steer Claude back on track—no wasted turns. Get up to 40% faster development without disabling permissions entirely. Built on Parable, our own hand-written bash parser—no external dependencies, just pure Python. 14,000+ tests between the two. Example: rejecting unsafe operation in a chain Example: rejecting a command with advice, so Claude can keep going ✅ What gets approved Complex pipelines: Chained reads: Cloud inspection: Container debugging: Safe redirects: ,

bashclaude-codeclihookpermissionspython

Quick Facts

Stars242
Forks21
LanguagePython
CategoryClaude Skill
LicenseMIT
Quality Score70.2594536719916/100
Open Issues25
Last Updated2026-06-12
Created2026-01-07
Platformsclaude-code, cli, python
Est. Tokens~13k

Dippy alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a Dippy alternative? If you're comparing Dippy with other claude skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • pydantic-deepagents by vstorm-co · ⭐ 1.0k

    Open-source, self-hosted Claude Code - a terminal AI assistant and the Python framework behind it. Tool-callin

  • runprompt by chr15m · ⭐ 443

    Run LLM prompts from your shell

  • MassGen by massgen · ⭐ 1.1k

    🚀 MassGen is an open-source multi-agent scaling system that runs in your terminal, autonomously orchestrating

  • arcade-mcp by ArcadeAI · ⭐ 1.0k

    MCP Server Framework and Tool Development library for building custom capabilities into agents.

  • drift by dadbodgeoff · ⭐ 785

    Codebase intelligence for AI. Detects patterns & conventions + remembers decisions across sessions. MCP server

  • roam-code by Cranot · ⭐ 518

    Local codebase intelligence CLI + MCP server for AI coding agents: SQLite code graph, 28 languages, 287 comman

More Claude Skill Tools

Explore other popular claude skill tools:

View all Claude Skill tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Dippy?

Dippy is 🐤 Less permission fatigue, more momentum. Dippy knows what’s safe to run and keeps Claude on track when plans change.. It is categorized as a Claude Skill with 242 GitHub stars.

What programming language is Dippy written in?

Dippy is primarily written in Python. It covers topics such as bash, claude-code, cli.

How do I install or use Dippy?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the Dippy GitHub repository at github.com/ldayton/Dippy. The project has 242 stars and 21 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does Dippy use?

Dippy is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to Dippy?

The top alternatives to Dippy on Agent Skills Hub include pydantic-deepagents, runprompt, MassGen. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Claude Skill tools