by anthropics · Claude Skill · ★ 484
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 484 |
| Forks | 80 |
| Category | Claude Skill |
| Quality Score | 53/100 |
| Open Issues | 555 |
| Last Updated | 2026-06-08 |
| Created | 2025-12-05 |
| Platforms | claude-code, mcp |
| Est. Tokens | ~3k |
Claude.ai MCP Integration This repository is the communication hub for MCP (Model Context Protocol) integration in Claude.ai. Use it to stay updated on technical changes and to report bugs or request features.
Looking for a claude-ai-mcp alternative? If you're comparing claude-ai-mcp with other claude skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
A desktop MCP client designed as a tool unitary utility integration, accelerating AI adoption through the Mode
MCP-NixOS - Model Context Protocol Server for NixOS resources
Stock market MCP server for Yahoo Finance data, technical analysis, portfolio tracking, and Python backtesting
Enable any LLM (e.g. Claude) to interactively debug any language for you via MCP and a VS Code Extension
Giving Claude ability to run code with E2B via MCP (Model Context Protocol)
An MCP server that executes Python code in isolated rootless containers with optional MCP server proxying. Imp
Explore other popular claude skill tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: