explainer-video — security grade SAFE, quality 71/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 71/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by Mng-dev-ai · Codex Skill · ★ 19

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is explainer-video safe to install? View the security audit →

About explainer-video

AI skill that turns any topic into an animated narrated explainer video. Runs locally, free, works with Claude Code / Codex / Cursor.

Quick Facts

Stars19
Forks4
LanguageJavaScript
CategoryCodex Skill
LicenseMIT
Quality Score70.5672273400311/100
Last Updated2026-05-27
Created2026-05-27
Platformsclaude-code, codex, node
Est. Tokens~14k

More Codex Skill Tools

Explore other popular codex skill tools:

View all Codex Skill tools →

Popular JavaScript Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is explainer-video?

explainer-video is AI skill that turns any topic into an animated narrated explainer video. Runs locally, free, works with Claude Code / Codex / Cursor.. It is categorized as a Codex Skill with 19 GitHub stars.

What programming language is explainer-video written in?

explainer-video is primarily written in JavaScript.

How do I install or use explainer-video?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the explainer-video GitHub repository at github.com/Mng-dev-ai/explainer-video. The project has 19 stars and 4 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does explainer-video use?

explainer-video is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Codex Skill tools