by MoaKK · Agent Tool · ★ 102
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 102 |
| Forks | 1 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| Quality Score | 66/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-05-04 |
| Created | 2026-05-04 |
| Platforms | claude-code, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~3k |
AI Code Reviewer A GitHub Actions bot that automatically reviews pull requests using the Claude API. When a PR is opened or updated, the bot fetches the diff, sends each changed file to Claude for analysis, and posts inline comments and a summary directly on the PR.
Looking for a AI-Code-Reviewer alternative? If you're comparing AI-Code-Reviewer with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Evidence-based code review skills for Codex and Claude Code
Build mods for Claude Code: Hook any request, modify any response, /model "with-your-custom-model", intelligen
HeyClaude (formerly Claude Pro Directory) is a searchable collection of pre-built AI skills, agents, MCP serve
Self-hosted framework for orchestrating fleets of specialist AI agents — ensemble reasoning and a full agentic
C++ MCP SDK - build Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers and clients in C++ / CPP. Enterprise-grade security,
Self-Hosted LLM Code Review Agent for GitLab, Forgejo and GitHub. Local LLM support
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: