by NeuZhou · MCP Server · ★ 237
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 237 |
| Forks | 19 |
| Language | D2 |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 54/100 |
| Open Issues | 13 |
| Last Updated | 2026-04-13 |
| Created | 2026-04-04 |
| Platforms | claude-code, cli, codex, mcp |
| Est. Tokens | ~1546k |
NEW: AgentSentinel -- We went from studying agent anatomy to protecting it. A zero-trust local proxy that monitors, secures, and records every decision your AI agent makes. Built from the security findings of our 16+ agent teardowns. English | 简体中文 <h
Looking for a awesome-ai-anatomy alternative? If you're comparing awesome-ai-anatomy with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
203 deep-dive tutorials for AI agents, LLM frameworks, coding tools, MCP, and open-source developer platforms
🐔 Agentic systems explained with chickens — the 2024 taxonomy + the 2026 canon (context engineering, skills,
Persistent memory for AI coding agents
Chapter-by-chapter teardown of a production coding agent — agent loop, context engineering, compaction, permis
Governance gateway for AI agents — bounded, auditable, session-aware control with MCP proxy, shell proxy & HTT
Claude Code 源码深度研究，包括 Foundations/Execution/Infrastructure 三大章节和 23 个子系统的架构分析拆解。
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: