by johnxie · MCP Server · ★ 65
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 65 |
| Forks | 10 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 66/100 |
| Open Issues | 1 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-12 |
| Created | 2025-09-04 |
| Platforms | cli, mcp, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~25k |
Awesome Code Docs 203 deep-dive tutorials for AI agents, LLM frameworks & coding tools Learn how complex systems actually work — not just what they do Browse Tutorials · A-Z Directory · Query Hub · Intent Map · Market Signals · Learning Paths · Contributing · Community Why This Exists Most documentation tells you what to do.
Looking for a awesome-code-docs alternative? If you're comparing awesome-code-docs with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Source code teardowns of 14 AI coding agents. What is actually inside Claude Code, Dify, OpenHands, Cline, Mem
HeyClaude (formerly Claude Pro Directory) is a searchable collection of pre-built AI skills, agents, MCP serve
[archived] c4 GenAI Suite
AI tools curated by autonomous AI agents for makers and SMBs
🌍 The open-source Wikipedia of AI — 2M+ apps, agents, LLMs & datasets. Updated daily with tools, tutorials &
An introduction to the world of AI Agents
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: