by NiharShrotri · LLM Plugin · ★ 55
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 55 |
| Forks | 21 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | LLM Plugin |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 74/100 |
| Open Issues | 2 |
| Last Updated | 2026-04-20 |
| Created | 2026-04-09 |
| Platforms | python |
| Est. Tokens | ~15k |
LLM-Wiki A local, LLM-maintained personal knowledge base. Drop documents in, watch an LLM compile them into a living, interlinked Obsidian wiki you can search and query. Feel free to fork and don't forget to give it a Star ⭐️ for better reach! Hello, I'm Nihar Shrotri, working as an AI Consultant.
Looking for a llm-wiki alternative? If you're comparing llm-wiki with other llm plugin tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
🤖 Visual AI agent workflow automation platform with local LLM integration - build intelligent workflows using
Andrej Karpathy's LLM Wiki pattern as a skill & Claude Code plugin — turn accumulated sources into a self-main
A memory-first AI agent that remembers why decisions were made — not just the last message. Runs local (Ollama
Local-first AI PKM for coding conversations: import Claude Code/Cursor/Codex, distill notes, semantic search,
Self-hosted framework for orchestrating fleets of specialist AI agents — ensemble reasoning and a full agentic
c4 GenAI Suite
Explore other popular llm plugin tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: