by Nimblesite · AI Tool · ★ 56
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
brew install nimblesite/tap/deslopTaken from the project's README on GitHub. Check the security audit before running it.
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 56 |
| Forks | 4 |
| Language | Rust |
| Category | AI Tool |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 54/100 |
| Open Issues | 163 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-11 |
| Created | 2026-04-19 |
| Platforms | rust |
| Est. Tokens | ~23k |
Deslop Live duplicate-code analysis inside your IDE. Inline warnings as you type, worst-offender view, and a live channel your AI agent can consult before it copy-pastes. Install for VS Code · Add to GitHub Actions · Documentation · Releases Install in your IDE VS Code Install Deslop Live from the VS Code Marketplace, then open a supported codebase.
Looking for a Deslop alternative? If you're comparing Deslop with other ai tool tools, these 3 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Skip to content github / docs Code Issues 80 Pull requests 35 Discussions Actions Projects 2 Security Insights
Skill to talk to Claude about your projects over the phone
.NET MAUI skills for GitHub Copilot and Claude Code
Explore other popular ai tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: