by NorbertBodziony · Agent Tool · ★ 7
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 7 |
| Forks | 1 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 70/100 |
| Open Issues | 4 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-05 |
| Created | 2026-08-19 |
| Platforms | node |
| Est. Tokens | ~5k |
Opinionated Biome GritQL rules for rejecting low-evidence TypeScript patterns
Looking for a biome-anti-slop alternative? If you're comparing biome-anti-slop with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
MCP server for Google Sheets - Read, write and manipulate spreadsheets through Claude Desktop
Governance gateway for AI agents — bounded, auditable, session-aware control with MCP proxy, shell proxy & HTT
🏛 [UNDER CONSTRUCTION] A (roman) claude plugin marketplace
Give your AI Agent a whole IDE, not just the files
Excel VBA integration for VS Code - Tree View / Full Direct VBA Read+Write / LiveShare Compatible / Direct Age
Local citation-backed recall for Pi, OMP, Claude Code, Codex, and ChatGPT history.
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: