by OFA-Sys · Agent Tool · ★ 290
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 290 |
| Forks | 8 |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| Quality Score | 58/100 |
| Open Issues | 9 |
| Last Updated | 2023-08-20 |
| Created | 2023-08-14 |
| Est. Tokens | ~158k |
InsTag: A Tool for Data Analysis in LLM Supervised Fine-tuning We introduce a tool named InsTag for analyzing supervised fine-tuning (SFT) data in LLM aligning with human preference. For local tagging deployment, we release InsTagger, fine-tuned on InsTag results, to tag the queries in SFT data.
Looking for a InsTag alternative? If you're comparing InsTag with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
🦙 Integrating LLMs into structured NLP pipelines
Empower Large Language Models (LLM) using Knowledge Graph based Retrieval-Augmented Generation (KG-RAG) for kn
Toolkit for fine-tuning, ablating and unit-testing open-source LLMs.
A curated list of resources for Japanese natural language processing (NLP): Python libraries, LLMs, dictionari
LLM-based ontological extraction tools, including SPIRES
Ship RAG based LLM web apps in seconds.
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: