by OmniJev · LLM Plugin · ★ 185
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
pip install git+https://github.com/OmniJev/OneJev.gitTaken from the project's README on GitHub. Check the security audit before running it.
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 185 |
| Forks | 18 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | LLM Plugin |
| License | Apache-2.0 |
| Quality Score | 68/100 |
| Open Issues | 1 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-22 |
| Created | 2026-09-27 |
| Platforms | python |
| Est. Tokens | ~14k |
English · 简体中文 · 日本語 <img alt="PyTorch" src="https://img.shields.io/badge/PyTo
Looking for a OneJev alternative? If you're comparing OneJev with other llm plugin tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Open-source alternative to TypeSafe's Jev: a System One style model layer that gives typed, calibrated decisio
1207 public resources for Jev, TypeSafe AI's System One decision model, indexed by decision pattern. Source ci
Awesome list of TypeSafe AI Jev use cases: 74 demos ranked by likes, 150+ GitHub repos, limits, cost and API e
JevK5: open-weight alternative to TypeSafe Jev. Typed decisions with probabilities in one forward pass; Apache
TypeSafe Jev for DeepSeek Harness, the Model Context Protocol, and plain Node: typed judgments instead of pros
The open-source System One decision model. Sub-15ms, non-autoregressive, local drop-in alternative to TypeSafe
Explore other popular llm plugin tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: