awesome-jev — security grade SAFE, quality 59/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 59/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by kydlikebtc · Agent Tool · ★ 168

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is awesome-jev safe to install? View the security audit →

About awesome-jev

awesome-jev Every public example of Jev — TypeSafe AI's System One decision model — indexed by the decision it makes, not by the blog that mentioned it. Searchable site &nbsp;·&nbsp; 中文 &nbsp;·&nbsp; Patterns &nbsp;·&nbsp; Compatibility &nbsp;·&nbsp; Vetting <a href="https://kydlikebtc.github.io/awes

agent-toolsai-agentsawesomeawesome-listcalibrationcatalogclassificationcontext-compactiondecision-modelintent-routing

Quick Facts

Stars168
Forks1
LanguagePython
CategoryAgent Tool
Quality Score58.7680139019895/100
Open Issues1
Last Updated2026-09-23
Created2026-09-22
Platformspython
Est. Tokens~25k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with awesome-jev for enhanced workflows:

  • AnyJev — semantic(0.40)+complementary+rare_topics+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (77%)
  • von — semantic(0.44)+complementary+rare_topics+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (74%)
  • open-alternative-jev — semantic(0.22)+complementary+rare_topics+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (71%)

awesome-jev alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a awesome-jev alternative? If you're comparing awesome-jev with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • awesome-jev by kraayenjon · ⭐ 113

    A curated list of Jev use cases, projects, SDKs, and resources. Jev is TypeSafe AI's System One model for fast

  • awesome-jev-use-cases by walidboulanouar · ⭐ 112

    Awesome list of TypeSafe AI Jev use cases: 74 demos ranked by likes, 150+ GitHub repos, limits, cost and API e

  • awesome-jev-projects by logicrw · ⭐ 396

    Awesome Jev: source-backed open-source ecosystem radar, plain-language project discovery, and automatic GitHub

  • awesome-jev by OmniJev · ⭐ 65

    🔥🔥 Papers, open reproductions and independent evaluations behind System One models and Jev.

  • awesome-jev-zh by yzfly · ⭐ 60

    Jev / TypeSafe System One 中文精选列表:官方资料、SDK、爆款应用、Agent 工具、开源复现与独立评测,附中文上手指南,每日自动收录 GitHub 热门项目。

  • awesome-jev by cobanov · ⭐ 353

    A curated, source-backed list of projects built with Jev, TypeSafe AI's System One model for typed decisions.

More Agent Tool Tools

Explore other popular agent tool tools:

View all Agent Tool tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is awesome-jev?

awesome-jev is 805 verified examples of Jev — TypeSafe AI's System One decision model — indexed by the decision each one makes, not the blog that mentioned it. Every cited call site is re-read by CI each week. Bilin. It is categorized as a Agent Tool with 168 GitHub stars.

What programming language is awesome-jev written in?

awesome-jev is primarily written in Python. It covers topics such as agent-tools, ai-agents, awesome.

How do I install or use awesome-jev?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the awesome-jev GitHub repository at github.com/kydlikebtc/awesome-jev. The project has 168 stars and 1 forks, indicating an active community.

What are the best alternatives to awesome-jev?

The top alternatives to awesome-jev on Agent Skills Hub include awesome-jev, awesome-jev-use-cases, awesome-jev-projects. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Agent Tool tools