by Onward0131 · MCP Server · ★ 10
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 10 |
| Forks | 0 |
| Language | JavaScript |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 68/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-15 |
| Created | 2026-08-04 |
| Platforms | codex, gemini, mcp, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~14k |
Provider-neutral image generation and editing MCP with a Codex Skill. Supports OpenAI Images, Gemini, and chat image APIs.
These tools work well together with universal-image-mcp for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a universal-image-mcp alternative? If you're comparing universal-image-mcp with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Expose agent CLIs (Codex, Cursor Agent, Claude Code, Gemini) as an OpenAI-compatible /v1 API gateway.
LLM-powered Agent Runtime with Dynamic DAG Planning & Concurrent Execution
Governance gateway for AI agents — bounded, auditable, session-aware control with MCP proxy, shell proxy & HTT
Local citation-backed recall for Pi, OMP, Claude Code, Codex, and ChatGPT history.
Your Digital Companion. Self-hosted Telegram bot orchestrating multiple AI providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Googl
A light-weight and straightforward workflow for spec-driven development with Claude Code and Codex. Written in
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: