luna-chat-coder — security grade SAFE, quality 63/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 63/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by Osteoporosis · Agent Tool · ★ 62

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is luna-chat-coder safe to install? View the security audit →

About luna-chat-coder

Luna Chat Coder 한국어 README Version 0.1.5 Use ordinary ChatGPT Web conversations for real GitHub repository work—without running a local coding agent, opening a tunnel, or giving the chat access to your computer. ChatGPT already has a sandbox that can run code. The catch is that network restrictions can stop repository work when the chat needs source, dependencies, or a reliable way to publish a larger change. Luna teaches the model to keep the development loop in that built-in sandbox and use connected GitHub access only for the missing pieces. What you get A useful built-in workspace. Editing, building, testing, and debugging stay in the chat sandbox whenever it can do the job. Fewer dead ends. If the normal path cannot complete a step reliably, Luna can use GitHub for that step instead of giving up or moving the whole workflow elsewhere. Safer recovery. If the chat or sandbox disappears, Luna resumes from exact GitHub state rather than trying to recreate code from conversation history. Reliable handoff.

agent-skills

Quick Facts

Stars62
Forks11
CategoryAgent Tool
LicenseMIT
Quality Score62.9200001992709/100
Last Updated2026-09-06
Created2026-08-17
Platformsbrowser
Est. Tokens~6k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with luna-chat-coder for enhanced workflows:

  • agent-link — semantic(0.44)+complementary+similar_pop (50%)

luna-chat-coder alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a luna-chat-coder alternative? If you're comparing luna-chat-coder with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • canvas-mcp by vishalsachdev · ⭐ 256

    Canvas LMS MCP server — up to 102 tools and 8 agent skills for students & educators. Works with Claude, Cursor

  • claudepro-directory by JSONbored · ⭐ 217

    HeyClaude (formerly Claude Pro Directory) is a searchable collection of pre-built AI skills, agents, MCP serve

  • ask-user-questions-mcp by paulp-o · ⭐ 139

    Better 'AskUserQuestion' - A lightweight MCP server/OpenCode plugin/Agent Skills + CLI tool that allows your L

  • RivalSearchMCP by damionrashford · ⭐ 131

    Deterministic research MCP server on FastMCP 3 — 5-engine web search, 9-platform social search, 6 academic DBs

  • agent-designer by appautomaton · ⭐ 130

    Portable SKILLs workspace for Claude Code, Codex, and Gemini — issue-driven workflows and cross-agent collabor

  • mcp-steroid by jonnyzzz · ⭐ 78

    Give your AI Agent a whole IDE, not just the files

More Agent Tool Tools

Explore other popular agent tool tools:

View all Agent Tool tools →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is luna-chat-coder?

luna-chat-coder is Agent Skill and repository template for end-to-end software development entirely inside ordinary Web AI chat.. It is categorized as a Agent Tool with 62 GitHub stars.

How do I install or use luna-chat-coder?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the luna-chat-coder GitHub repository at github.com/Osteoporosis/luna-chat-coder. The project has 62 stars and 11 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does luna-chat-coder use?

luna-chat-coder is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to luna-chat-coder?

The top alternatives to luna-chat-coder on Agent Skills Hub include canvas-mcp, claudepro-directory, ask-user-questions-mcp. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Agent Tool tools