by OvertliDS · MCP Server · ★ 54
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
git clone https://github.com/OvertliDS/mcp-searxng-enhanced.gitTaken from the project's README on GitHub. Check the security audit before running it.
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 54 |
| Forks | 16 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 76/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-05-05 |
| Created | 2025-05-10 |
| Platforms | browser, docker, mcp, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~6k |
MCP SearXNG Enhanced Server A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for category-aware web search, website scraping, and date/time tools. Designed for seamless integration with SearXNG and modern MCP clients.
Looking for a mcp-searxng-enhanced alternative? If you're comparing mcp-searxng-enhanced with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Penpot MCP server
MCP Server for Facebook ADs Library - Get instant answers from FB's ad library
Polymcp provides a simple and efficient way to interact with MCP servers using custom agents
Magg: The MCP Aggregator
API 200 is an open source API gateway to simplify 3rd-party integrations. Import endpoints, set up caching, re
The evaluation benchmark on MCP servers
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: