by PathOnAIOrg · Agent Tool · ★ 152
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
pip install litewebagentTaken from the project's README on GitHub.
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 152 |
| Forks | 28 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| Quality Score | 62/100 |
| Last Updated | 2025-07-11 |
| Created | 2024-07-16 |
| Platforms | browser, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~5656k |
LiteWebAgent Disclaimer: Please note that LiteWebAgent is not affiliated with any for-profit company. This is a collaborative project from PathOnAI.org, an open-source AI research community, where Danqing Zhang (danqing.zhang.personal@gmail.com) is the main contributor and lead author of the NAACL paper.
Looking for a LiteWebAgent alternative? If you're comparing LiteWebAgent with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
A multi-agent chatroom for AutoGen agents
Integrating AI into every workflow with our open-source, no-code platform, powered by the actor model for dyna
An Execution Isolation Architecture for LLM-Based Agentic Systems
A declarative way to control LLMs.
Shell and coding agent on mcp clients
Fuji is an AI agent that lives in your browser's sidepanel. You can now get tasks done online with a single co
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: