LiteWebAgent — security grade SAFE, quality 62/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 62/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by PathOnAIOrg · Agent Tool · ★ 153

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is LiteWebAgent safe to install? View the security audit →

About LiteWebAgent

LiteWebAgent Disclaimer: Please note that LiteWebAgent is not affiliated with any for-profit company. This is a collaborative project from PathOnAI.org, an open-source AI research community, where Danqing Zhang (danqing.zhang.personal@gmail.com) is the main contributor and lead author of the NAACL paper. If anyone claims LiteWebAgent is affiliated with any for-profit company, please contact Danqing Zhang (danqing.zhang.personal@gmail.com) for verification. Follow-Up Work: VisualTreeSearch VisualTreeSearch is a production-ready system for visualizing and understanding web agent test-time scaling. It builds upon LiteWebAgent to provide an intuitive framework for researchers and users to understand tree search execution in web agents. Resources 🌐 Project Page: PathOnAI.org/VisualTreeSearch 🎮 Live Demo: visual-tree-search.pathonai.org 📄 Paper: Read on arXiv 🎥 Video Demo: Watch on YouTube Join the community!

agentagent-based-frameworkagentic-agiagentic-frameworkagentic-workflowai-agentai-agentsautonomous-agentautonomous-agentsfastapi

Quick Facts

Stars153
Forks27
LanguagePython
CategoryAgent Tool
Quality Score62.0004481755788/100
Last Updated2025-07-11
Created2024-07-16
Platformsbrowser, python
Est. Tokens~5656k

LiteWebAgent alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a LiteWebAgent alternative? If you're comparing LiteWebAgent with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • Agent-ChatRoom by LittleLittleCloud · ⭐ 82

    A multi-agent chatroom for AutoGen agents

  • open-computer-use by coasty-ai · ⭐ 763

    State of the Art 82% OSWorld Computer Using Agent, production-ready. Remote and Local! Setup using one API Key

  • craftgen by craftgen · ⭐ 316

    Integrating AI into every workflow with our open-source, no-code platform, powered by the actor model for dyna

  • captain-claw by kstevica · ⭐ 165

    Self-hosted framework for orchestrating fleets of specialist AI agents — ensemble reasoning and a full agentic

  • SecGPT by llm-platform-security · ⭐ 121

    An Execution Isolation Architecture for LLM-Based Agentic Systems

  • Noema-Declarative-AI by AlbanPerli · ⭐ 81

    A declarative way to control LLMs.

More Agent Tool Tools

Explore other popular agent tool tools:

View all Agent Tool tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is LiteWebAgent?

LiteWebAgent is [NAACL2025] LiteWebAgent: The Open-Source Suite for VLM-Based Web-Agent Applications. It is categorized as a Agent Tool with 153 GitHub stars.

What programming language is LiteWebAgent written in?

LiteWebAgent is primarily written in Python. It covers topics such as agent, agent-based-framework, agentic-agi.

How do I install or use LiteWebAgent?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the LiteWebAgent GitHub repository at github.com/PathOnAIOrg/LiteWebAgent. The project has 153 stars and 27 forks, indicating an active community.

What are the best alternatives to LiteWebAgent?

The top alternatives to LiteWebAgent on Agent Skills Hub include Agent-ChatRoom, open-computer-use, craftgen. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Agent Tool tools