by PatterAI · Codex Skill · ★ 1.1k
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
npx skills add patterai/skills
npm install getpatter
Taken from the project's README on GitHub. Check the security audit before running it.
Flagged: opens a tunnel service. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 1,065 |
| Forks | 125 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | Codex Skill |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 66/100 |
| Open Issues | 10 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-03 |
| Created | 2026-04-07 |
| Platforms | python |
| Est. Tokens | ~15k |
Patter SDK About • How It Works • Documentation • Quickstart • Skills • Templates About
These tools work well together with Patter for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a Patter alternative? If you're comparing Patter with other codex skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Open-source, self-hostable platform for building and operating AI phone agents.
Official one-stop shop for AI Agents and developers building with Telnyx.
🦞 OpenClaw & Hermes Agent 多引擎 AI 管理面板 — 内置 AI 助手(工具调用 + 图片识别 + 多模态),一键安装 | Tauri v2 跨平台桌面应用 | 11 种语言
High-performance OpenAI and Anthropic compatible LLM inference server for Apple Silicon. Native MLX, continuou
Overture is an open-source, locally running web interface delivered as an MCP (Model Context Protocol) server
Make your meetings accessible to AI Agents
Explore other popular codex skill tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: