by PyModel · MCP Server · ★ 61
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
npx skills add PyModel/niblet-skill-mcp --skill niblet -y
git clone https://github.com/PyModel/niblet-skill-mcp
Taken from the project's README on GitHub. Check the security audit before running it.
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 61 |
| Forks | 4 |
| Language | JavaScript |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | Apache-2.0 |
| Quality Score | 76/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-17 |
| Created | 2026-09-06 |
| Platforms | claude-code, mcp, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~15k |
Real screen references and a design skill, for coding agents that build UI. <img alt="Visitors" src="
Looking for a niblet-skill-mcp alternative? If you're comparing niblet-skill-mcp with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
🏛 [UNDER CONSTRUCTION] A (roman) claude plugin marketplace
DeepContext is an MCP server that adds symbol-aware semantic search to Claude Code, Codex CLI, and other agent
HeyClaude (formerly Claude Pro Directory) is a searchable collection of pre-built AI skills, agents, MCP serve
MCP Fusion - The framework for AI-native MCP servers.
📜 An MCP server for conversation history search and retrieval in Claude Code
Portable SKILLs workspace for Claude Code, Codex, and Gemini — issue-driven workflows and cross-agent collabor
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: