ChatMock — security grade SAFE, quality 73/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 73/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by RayBytes · Codex Skill · ★ 1.5k

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is ChatMock safe to install? View the security audit →

About ChatMock

ChatMock Allows Codex to work in your favourite chat apps and coding tools. Install Homebrew pipx / pip GUI Download from releases (macOS & Windows) Docker See DOCKER.md Getting Started The server runs at by default. Use as your base URL for OpenAI-compatible apps. Usage Python python from openai import OpenAI client = OpenAI( baseurl="http://127.0.0.1:8000/v1", apikey="anyth

aichatgptcodexgpt-5ollamaopenaiopenai-codex-cliopenai-codex-intergration

Quick Facts

Stars1,534
Forks211
LanguagePython
CategoryCodex Skill
LicenseMIT
Quality Score72.9423735407052/100
Open Issues12
Last Updated2026-09-01
Created2025-08-15
Platformscli, codex, python
Est. Tokens~14k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with ChatMock for enhanced workflows:

  • open-responses-server — semantic(0.48)+complementary+shared_fw(openai)+rare_topics+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (74%)
  • claude-codex-settings — semantic(0.16)+complementary+shared_fw(openai)+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (64%)
  • openai-toolbox — semantic(0.27)+complementary+shared_fw(openai)+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (62%)
  • MCP-Bridge — semantic(0.16)+complementary+shared_fw(openai)+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (59%)
  • open-assistant-api — semantic(0.16)+complementary+shared_fw(openai)+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (59%)

ChatMock alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a ChatMock alternative? If you're comparing ChatMock with other codex skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • awesome-ChatGPT-repositories by taishi-i · ⭐ 3.3k

    A curated list of open source GitHub repositories related to ChatGPT, the OpenAI API, and Codex. Searchable vi

  • codexia by milisp · ⭐ 926

    Lightweight Agent Workstation for Codex + Claude code — with dots, task scheduler, git worktree & remote contr

  • py-gpt by szczyglis-dev · ⭐ 2.0k

    Desktop AI Assistant powered by GPT-6, GPT-5, Gemini, Claude, Grok, Ollama, DeepSeek, Perplexity, and more - c

  • zcf by UfoMiao · ⭐ 6.1k

    Zero-Config Code Flow for Claude code & Codex

  • sdk-python by strands-agents · ⭐ 6.0k

    A model-driven approach to building AI agents in just a few lines of code.

  • client by openai-php · ⭐ 5.8k

    ⚡️ OpenAI PHP is a supercharged community-maintained PHP API client that allows you to interact with OpenAI AP

More Codex Skill Tools

Explore other popular codex skill tools:

View all Codex Skill tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is ChatMock?

ChatMock is OpenAI & Ollama compatible API powered by Codex. It is categorized as a Codex Skill with 1.5k GitHub stars.

What programming language is ChatMock written in?

ChatMock is primarily written in Python. It covers topics such as ai, chatgpt, codex.

How do I install or use ChatMock?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the ChatMock GitHub repository at github.com/RayBytes/ChatMock. The project has 1.5k stars and 211 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does ChatMock use?

ChatMock is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to ChatMock?

The top alternatives to ChatMock on Agent Skills Hub include awesome-ChatGPT-repositories, codexia, py-gpt. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Codex Skill tools