by RipeMangoBox · Codex Skill · ★ 62
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 62 |
| Forks | 14 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | Codex Skill |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 63/100 |
| Open Issues | 1 |
| Last Updated | 2026-08-13 |
| Created | 2026-04-08 |
| Platforms | claude-code, cli, codex, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~15k |
BITE Bibliographic Intelligence for Thought Emergence 让每一个 idea 都有 出处，让每一个判断都有 锚点。 中文 | English 本项目前身为 ResearchFlow，现已更名为 BITE（Bibliographic Intelligence for Thought Emergence）。 🔥 BITE 社区交流 | [💬 微信交流 / BITE微信交流群](./WECHATCN
These tools work well together with BITE for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a BITE alternative? If you're comparing BITE with other codex skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
De-Anthropocentric Research Engine — AI-powered academic research automation with deep literature survey, gap
Shareable Claude Code infrastructure for PhD researchers — skills, agents, hooks, and rules for academic workf
CLI-first MCP server for composer-based Kirby CMS projects — inspect blueprints/templates/plugins, interact wi
Karpathy-style personal wiki for LLMs - markdown + frontmatter, no vector DB, no RAG. Built for Claude Code, w
Fully Autonomous AI Research System with Self-Evolution, built natively on Claude Code
Asks what to optimise and how to measure it, then runs experiments on its own branch.
Explore other popular codex skill tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: