BITE — security grade SAFE, quality 63/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 63/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by RipeMangoBox · Codex Skill · ★ 61

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is BITE safe to install? View the security audit →

About BITE

BITE Bibliographic Intelligence for Thought Emergence 让每一个 idea 都有 出处,让每一个判断都有 锚点。 中文 | English 本项目前身为 ResearchFlow,现已更名为 BITE(Bibliographic Intelligence for Thought Emergence)。 🔥 BITE 社区交流 | [💬 微信交流 / BITE微信交流群](./WECHATCN

academic-researchclaude-codecodex-cliknowledge-baseobsidianpaper-analysisresearch-assistantresearch-automationresearch-workflowsemi-automated-research

Quick Facts

Stars61
Forks14
LanguagePython
CategoryCodex Skill
LicenseMIT
Quality Score62.6494135492042/100
Open Issues1
Last Updated2026-08-13
Created2026-04-08
Platformsclaude-code, cli, codex, python
Est. Tokens~15k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with BITE for enhanced workflows:

  • ai-research-skills — semantic(0.32)+complementary+rare_topics+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (66%)
  • claude-research — semantic(0.31)+complementary+rare_topics+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (65%)
  • STORM-Research-Assistant — semantic(0.40)+complementary+rare_topics+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (63%)

BITE alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a BITE alternative? If you're comparing BITE with other codex skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • ai-research-skills by WenyuChiou · ⭐ 232

    Universal SKILL.md catalog for research workflows: literature review, research design, project memory, manuscr

  • De-Anthropocentric-Research-Engine by Pthahnix · ⭐ 229

    De-Anthropocentric Research Engine — AI-powered academic research automation with deep literature survey, gap

  • claude-research by flonat · ⭐ 116

    Shareable Claude Code infrastructure for PhD researchers — skills, agents, hooks, and rules for academic workf

  • karpathy-claude-wiki by Benboerba620 · ⭐ 62

    Karpathy-style personal wiki for LLMs - markdown + frontmatter, no vector DB, no RAG. Built for Claude Code, w

  • kirby-mcp by bnomei · ⭐ 59

    CLI-first MCP server for composer-based Kirby CMS projects — inspect blueprints/templates/plugins, interact wi

  • AutoResearch-SibylSystem by Sibyl-Research-Team · ⭐ 281

    Fully Autonomous AI Research System with Self-Evolution, built natively on Claude Code

More Codex Skill Tools

Explore other popular codex skill tools:

View all Codex Skill tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is BITE?

BITE is Semi-automated research assistant and local knowledge base for paper analysis, ideation, coding, experiments, writing, and publication workflows.. It is categorized as a Codex Skill with 61 GitHub stars.

What programming language is BITE written in?

BITE is primarily written in Python. It covers topics such as academic-research, claude-code, codex-cli.

How do I install or use BITE?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the BITE GitHub repository at github.com/RipeMangoBox/BITE. The project has 61 stars and 14 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does BITE use?

BITE is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to BITE?

The top alternatives to BITE on Agent Skills Hub include ai-research-skills, De-Anthropocentric-Research-Engine, claude-research. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Codex Skill tools