by Rohit24567 · Codex Skill · ★ 389
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
Trade smarter, not harder. Hyperliquid Claw gives your AI assistant full access to Hyperliquid DEX
| Stars | 389 |
| Forks | 0 |
| Language | Rust |
| Category | Codex Skill |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 56.6354604538371/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-03-13 |
| Created | 2026-03-09 |
| Platforms | rust |
| Est. Tokens | ~11k |
These tools work well together with HyperLiquid-Claw for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a HyperLiquid-Claw alternative? If you're comparing HyperLiquid-Claw with other codex skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Natively - Free open-source AI interview copilot & meeting assistant. The best Cluely alternative, Final Round
Implementing Skills functionality for your agents
Official Microsoft Learn MCP Server and CLI tool – powering LLMs and AI agents with real-time, trusted Microso
Desktop AI Assistant powered by GPT-5, GPT-4, o1, o3, Gemini, Claude, Ollama, DeepSeek, Perplexity, Grok, Biel
A Utility CLI for AI Coding Agents
Open-source earning-focused swarm intelligence engine. Self-governing AI collectives (queen, workers, quorum v
Explore other popular codex skill tools:
HyperLiquid-Claw is Trade smarter, not harder. Hyperliquid Claw gives your AI assistant full access to Hyperliquid DEX. It is categorized as a Codex Skill with 389 GitHub stars.
HyperLiquid-Claw is primarily written in Rust. It covers topics such as ai, ai-assistant, ai-assistants.
You can find installation instructions and usage details in the HyperLiquid-Claw GitHub repository at github.com/Rohit24567/HyperLiquid-Claw. The project has 389 stars and 0 forks, indicating an active community.
HyperLiquid-Claw is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.
The top alternatives to HyperLiquid-Claw on Agent Skills Hub include natively-cluely-ai-assistant, skillkit, mcp. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.