by SDLLL · MCP Server · ★ 60
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
Give your AI Agent the power to control Safari on macOS. No extensions, no separate browser.
| Stars | 60 |
| Forks | 10 |
| Language | JavaScript |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 58.5601173248144/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-08-04 |
| Created | 2026-02-28 |
| Platforms | browser, claude-code, mcp, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~3k |
Looking for a claude-for-safari alternative? If you're comparing claude-for-safari with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Native Safari browser automation for AI agents. 80 tools via AppleScript — zero overhead, keeps logins, runs s
Claude Code skill for free Google AI Mode search with citations. Zero-config setup, persistent browser profile
Personal Assistant Wizard for Claude Code — npx pawmode
World-class creative director in a skill. Methodology-driven ideation (SIT, TRIZ, Lateral Thinking, bisociatio
CLI, MCP server, and npm library that turns any website into an API — no docs, no SDK, no browser.
The AI agent that works while you don't watch. Lives in your menu bar, finds you when needed.
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
claude-for-safari is Give your AI Agent the power to control Safari on macOS. No extensions, no separate browser.. It is categorized as a MCP Server with 60 GitHub stars.
claude-for-safari is primarily written in JavaScript. It covers topics such as ai-agent, applescript, browser-automation.
You can find installation instructions and usage details in the claude-for-safari GitHub repository at github.com/SDLLL/claude-for-safari. The project has 60 stars and 10 forks, indicating an active community.
claude-for-safari is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.
The top alternatives to claude-for-safari on Agent Skills Hub include safari-mcp, google-ai-mode-skill, openpaw. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.