by SalesforceAIResearch · Agent Tool · ★ 637
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 637 |
| Forks | 60 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | Apache-2.0 |
| Quality Score | 62/100 |
| Open Issues | 8 |
| Last Updated | 2026-06-02 |
| Created | 2024-02-27 |
| Platforms | python |
| Est. Tokens | ~2504k |
[]() Paper | Key Features | -- Model Instruction | Framework | Installation | <a href="https://
Looking for a xLAM alternative? If you're comparing xLAM with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
The llama-cpp-agent framework is a tool designed for easy interaction with Large Language Models (LLMs). Allow
A curated list of tools, papers, and datasets for applying AI to cybersecurity tasks. This list primarily focu
A repo lists papers related to LLM based agent
[ICML 2024] LLMCompiler: An LLM Compiler for Parallel Function Calling
[GenAI Application Development Framework] 🚀 Build GenAI application quick and easy 💬 Easy to interact with
Low code tool to rapidly build and coordinate multi-agent teams
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: