by Scottcjn · Agent Tool · ★ 103
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 103 |
| Forks | 65 |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 59/100 |
| Open Issues | 22 |
| Last Updated | 2026-09-19 |
| Created | 2026-02-21 |
| Est. Tokens | ~11k |
Awesome Agents A curated list of AI agent platforms, frameworks, protocols, tools, and resources. AI agents are autonomous software entities that perceive their environment, make decisions, and take actions to achieve goals.
Looking for a awesome-agents alternative? If you're comparing awesome-agents with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
A curated list of AI Agent evolution, memory systems, multi-agent architectures, and self-improvement projects
Curated list of Agent Skills for AI coding agents like Claude Code, Codex and Cursor.
SDKs and reference implementations for the Synadia Agent Protocol for NATS
Autonomous AI Company OS — 14 AI agents loop 24/7, ship real software
A curated collection of resources for 🌌 Azure OpenAI, 🦙 LLMs (+RAG, Agents). Monthly Updates.
Practical techniques for coding with ai assistants (Claude Code, Codex CLI, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, etc). Avai
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: