nemo-assistant — security grade SAFE, quality 58/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 58/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by SevenBT · Agent Tool · ★ 93

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is nemo-assistant safe to install? View the security audit →

About nemo-assistant

Nemo Assistant · Floating Desktop AI Assistant Nemo Assistant is a lightweight desktop assistant that brings selection actions, screenshot OCR, Markdown notes, sticky notes, tool calling, and AI chat into one local-first workflow. It is not another chat window waiting for you to switch context. It is a set of small desktop actions that stay close to your work: translate while reading, polish while writing, capture and understand screen content, pin a quick sticky note, and let AI call tools, read notes, or save memories when needed. Built with PyQt6 + Fluent Design. Notes, memories, configuration, and conversations are stored locally by default. API keys are saved through the system keyring instead of plaintext config files. Chinese documentation

assistant-personnelfluent-designpyqt6pythonscreenshot-ocr

Quick Facts

Stars93
Forks0
LanguagePython
CategoryAgent Tool
LicenseMIT
Quality Score58.0386273606744/100
Open Issues2
Last Updated2026-09-12
Created2026-07-05
Platformspython
Est. Tokens~13k

nemo-assistant alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a nemo-assistant alternative? If you're comparing nemo-assistant with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • mcpstore by whillhill · ⭐ 427

    开盒即用的优雅管理mcp服务 | 结合Agent框架 | 作者听劝 | 已发布pypi | Vue页面demo

  • mcp-gateway by lasso-security · ⭐ 388

    A plugin-based gateway that orchestrates other MCPs and allows developers to build upon it enterprise-grade ag

  • claude-context-local by FarhanAliRaza · ⭐ 237

    Code search MCP for Claude Code. Make entire codebase the context for any coding agent. Embeddings are created

  • claudex by Mng-dev-ai · ⭐ 224

    Your own Claude Code UI, sandbox, in-browser VS Code, terminal, multi-provider support (Anthropic, OpenAI, Git

  • zettelkasten-mcp by entanglr · ⭐ 164

    A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that implements the Zettelkasten knowledge management methodology, allow

  • eval-view by hidai25 · ⭐ 133

    Regression testing for AI agents. Snapshot behavior,diff tool calls,catch regressions in CI. Works with LangGr

More Agent Tool Tools

Explore other popular agent tool tools:

View all Agent Tool tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is nemo-assistant?

nemo-assistant is Local-first floating desktop AI assistant for Windows — selection actions, OCR, notes, and a tool-calling agent.. It is categorized as a Agent Tool with 93 GitHub stars.

What programming language is nemo-assistant written in?

nemo-assistant is primarily written in Python. It covers topics such as assistant-personnel, fluent-design, pyqt6.

How do I install or use nemo-assistant?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the nemo-assistant GitHub repository at github.com/SevenBT/nemo-assistant. The project has 93 stars and 0 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does nemo-assistant use?

nemo-assistant is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to nemo-assistant?

The top alternatives to nemo-assistant on Agent Skills Hub include mcpstore, mcp-gateway, claude-context-local. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Agent Tool tools