by SummerRiversound · Agent Tool · ★ 13
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 13 |
| Forks | 1 |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 65/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-22 |
| Created | 2026-07-27 |
| Platforms | claude-code |
| Est. Tokens | ~2k |
Agent skill: make AI-written analysis/report docs easy for humans to read and share (fights AI verbosity/slop).
Looking for a human-readable-reports alternative? If you're comparing human-readable-reports with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Audits AI-generated frontend and rewrites it so it stops looking AI-made: purple-gradient slop and the "tastef
Skills for AI coding agents — Laravel, PHP, React, TypeScript, testing, security, and code quality.
Complete Kaggle integration plugin/skill for AI coding agents — competition reports, dataset/model downloads,
Agent Skill for generating AGENTS.md files following the agents.md convention | Claude Code compatible
A collection of Agent Skills for MATLAB development. Skills are specialized instruction sets that extend a cod
humanizer, but for code — an agent skill that removes AI-generated code slop: duplicated helpers, try-import f
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: