by THUDM · Agent Tool · ★ 3.7k
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 3,742 |
| Forks | 280 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | Apache-2.0 |
| Quality Score | 67/100 |
| Open Issues | 77 |
| Last Updated | 2026-02-08 |
| Created | 2023-07-28 |
| Platforms | python |
| Est. Tokens | ~1970k |
AgentBench 🌐 Leaderboard (new) 📃 Paper 👋 Join our Slack for Q & A or collaboration on next version of AgentBench! 🔥[2025.10.10] Introducing AgentBench FC (Function Calling) based on AgentRL The current repository contains the function-calling version of AgentBench, integrated with AgentRL, an end-to-end multitask and mutliturn LLM Agent RL framework.
Looking for a AgentBench alternative? If you're comparing AgentBench with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Harness LLMs with Multi-Agent Programming
A curated list of Generative AI tools, works, models, and references
Your agent in your terminal, equipped with local tools: writes code, uses the terminal, browses the web. Make
总结Prompt&LLM论文，开源数据&模型，AIGC应用
Conquer Any Code in VSCode: One-Click Comments, Conversions, UI-to-Code, and AI Batch Processing of Files! 在 V
Awesome things about LLM-powered agents. Papers / Repos / Blogs / ...
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: