by ThHanke · MCP Server · ★ 248
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 248 |
| Forks | 31 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | MCP Server |
| Quality Score | 63/100 |
| Open Issues | 1 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-16 |
| Created | 2025-09-03 |
| Platforms | browser, cli, mcp, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~22k |
Ontosphere — Browser-based RDF Knowledge Graph Editor ==================================================== Table of Contents Overview Key capabilities Quick start (development) Startup / URL parameters Reasoning Reasoning demo CORS and proxies Using the UI Developer utilities Troubleshooting AI / MCP Integration How it works Setup (Playwright / headless) Recommended workflow Using Ontosphere with...
Looking for a ontosphere alternative? If you're comparing ontosphere with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Ontology-based MCP server that analyzes database schemas (PostgreSQL, Snowflake, ClickHouse, Dremio) and gener
Score any document. Prove every claim.
Local-first AI agent memory with a knowledge graph, ontology constraints, and traceable reasoning—all in one S
Turn your scattered AI coding sessions into a queryable knowledge graph. Multi-platform (Claude Code, ChatGPT,
The EMBL-EBI Ontology Lookup Service (OLS)
MCP-based discovery and judgment layer for Korea’s open data portal—helping AI agents find, compare, and asses
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: