brain-in-the-fish — security grade SAFE, quality 60/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 60/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by fabio-rovai · MCP Server · ★ 83

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is brain-in-the-fish safe to install? View the security audit →

About brain-in-the-fish

Brain in the Fish Score any document. Prove every claim. What It Does Give it a document. Get back a score, a knowledge graph, and proof. Every claim the system makes about your document is backed by an exact quote from the text. If the quote doesn't exist in the document, the structural score drops and the gate flags it. Source quote verification built into the pipeline. Each node's quote is checked against the original document. Unverified quotes penalise the structural score — the system catches its own sloppy decomposition. Who It's For Fluent writing with no argument, fabricated ci

aianti-hallucinationaudit-traildocument-evaluationevidence-verificationfact-checkinghallucination-detectionknowledge-graphllm-evaluationmcp-server

Quick Facts

Stars83
Forks15
LanguageRust
CategoryMCP Server
LicenseMIT
Quality Score60.3813794940949/100
Last Updated2026-08-11
Created2026-03-23
Platformsmcp, rust
Est. Tokens~25k

brain-in-the-fish alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a brain-in-the-fish alternative? If you're comparing brain-in-the-fish with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • ontosphere by ThHanke · ⭐ 237

    Browser-based RDF/ontology knowledge graph editor — load RDF from files, URLs or SPARQL endpoints; author node

  • mykg by SenolIsci · ⭐ 72

    MyKG Knowledge Graph Engine: Turn raw files into knowledge graphs with induced ontology

  • session-graph by robertoshimizu · ⭐ 108

    Turn your scattered AI coding sessions into a queryable knowledge graph. Multi-platform (Claude Code, ChatGPT,

  • web-researcher-mcp by zoharbabin · ⭐ 59

    Give your AI assistant real web search, full-page reading, and multi-source research with citations that are n

  • sudocode by sudocode-ai · ⭐ 292

    Lightweight agent orchestration dev tool that lives in your repo

  • rust-docs-mcp-server by Govcraft · ⭐ 291

    🦀 Prevents outdated Rust code suggestions from AI assistants. This MCP server fetches current crate docs, use

More MCP Server Tools

Explore other popular mcp server tools:

View all MCP Server tools →

Popular Rust Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is brain-in-the-fish?

brain-in-the-fish is Score any document. Prove every claim.. It is categorized as a MCP Server with 83 GitHub stars.

What programming language is brain-in-the-fish written in?

brain-in-the-fish is primarily written in Rust. It covers topics such as ai, anti-hallucination, audit-trail.

How do I install or use brain-in-the-fish?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the brain-in-the-fish GitHub repository at github.com/fabio-rovai/brain-in-the-fish. The project has 83 stars and 15 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does brain-in-the-fish use?

brain-in-the-fish is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to brain-in-the-fish?

The top alternatives to brain-in-the-fish on Agent Skills Hub include ontosphere, mykg, session-graph. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse MCP Server tools