by TheUncharted · MCP Server · ★ 89
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
npm install @unchartedfr/zapcode # npm / yarn / pnpm / bun
pip install zapcode # pip / uv
Taken from the project's README on GitHub.
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 89 |
| Forks | 6 |
| Language | Rust |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 67/100 |
| Open Issues | 6 |
| Last Updated | 2026-08-29 |
| Created | 2026-03-11 |
| Platforms | mcp, rust |
| Est. Tokens | ~27k |
Zapcode Run AI-generated code. Safely. Instantly. A minimal, secure TypeScript interpreter written in Rust for use by AI agents Experimental — Zapcode is under active development. APIs may change. Why agents should write code AI agents are more capable when they write code instead of chaining tool calls.
Looking for a zapcode alternative? If you're comparing zapcode with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Your own Claude Code UI, sandbox, in-browser VS Code, terminal, multi-provider support (Anthropic, OpenAI, Git
MCP server for Claude Code/VSCode/Cursor/Windsurf to use editor self functionality. ⚡ Get real-time LSP diagno
🏛 [UNDER CONSTRUCTION] A (roman) claude plugin marketplace
ToolRegistry: A Protocol-Agnostic Tool Management Library for Function-Calling LLMs (OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini
Context-Engine MCP - Agentic Context Compression Suite
An introduction to the world of AI Agents
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: