charlotte — security grade SAFE, quality 76/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 76/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by TickTockBent · MCP Server · ★ 179

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is charlotte safe to install? View the security audit →

About charlotte

Charlotte The Web, Readable. Your AI agent burns 60,000 characters of accessibility tree just to look at the Hacker News front page. Charlotte does it in 337. Charlotte is an MCP server that gives AI agents structured, token-efficient access to the web. Instead of dumping the full accessibility tree on every call, Charlotte returns only what the agent needs: a compact page summary on arrival, targeted queries for specific elements, and full detail only when explicitly requested. On content-heavy pages that orientation is up to 180x smaller than a full accessibility-tree snapshot from Playwright MCP; on trivially small pages the two are roughly the same size. Why Charlotte? Most browser MCP servers dump the entire accessibility tree on every call — a flat text blob that can exceed a million characters on content-heavy pages. Agents pay for all of it whether they need it or not. Charlotte decomposes each page into a typed, structured representation — landmarks, headings, interactive elements, forms, content summaries — and lets agents control how much they receive with three detail levels.

ai-agentsmcpmcp-servermodel-context-protocoltypescriptweb-browsingweb-scraping

Quick Facts

Stars179
Forks20
LanguageTypeScript
CategoryMCP Server
LicenseMIT
Quality Score76.0455047631323/100
Open Issues8
Last Updated2026-09-11
Created2026-02-13
Platformsbrowser, mcp, node
Est. Tokens~19k

charlotte alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a charlotte alternative? If you're comparing charlotte with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • camofox-mcp by redf0x1 · ⭐ 99

    Anti-detection browser MCP server for AI agents — navigate, interact, and automate the web without getting blo

  • claude-emporium by Vvkmnn · ⭐ 82

    🏛 [UNDER CONSTRUCTION] A (roman) claude plugin marketplace

  • crawlbase-mcp by crawlbase · ⭐ 58

    Crawlbase MCP Server connects AI agents and LLMs with real-time web data. It powers Claude, Cursor, and Windsu

  • memorix by AVIDS2 · ⭐ 825

    Open-source cross-agent memory layer for coding agents via MCP. Compatible with Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Wi

  • reddit-mcp-buddy by karanb192 · ⭐ 798

    Clean, LLM-optimized Reddit MCP server. Browse posts, search content, analyze users. No fluff, just Reddit dat

  • drift by dadbodgeoff · ⭐ 785

    Codebase intelligence for AI. Detects patterns & conventions + remembers decisions across sessions. MCP server

More MCP Server Tools

Explore other popular mcp server tools:

View all MCP Server tools →

Popular TypeScript Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is charlotte?

charlotte is Token-efficient browser MCP server — structured web pages for AI agents, not raw accessibility dumps. It is categorized as a MCP Server with 179 GitHub stars.

What programming language is charlotte written in?

charlotte is primarily written in TypeScript. It covers topics such as ai-agents, mcp, mcp-server.

How do I install or use charlotte?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the charlotte GitHub repository at github.com/TickTockBent/charlotte. The project has 179 stars and 20 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does charlotte use?

charlotte is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to charlotte?

The top alternatives to charlotte on Agent Skills Hub include camofox-mcp, claude-emporium, crawlbase-mcp. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse MCP Server tools