GPT-Relay-Codex-Plugin-: what it is & alternatives

by Toolsai · Codex Skill · ★ 57

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 59/100

None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.

Quick Facts

Stars57
Forks6
LanguageJavaScript
CategoryCodex Skill
Quality Score59/100
Open Issues3
Last Updated2026-06-09
Created2026-06-09
Platformscodex, node
Est. Tokens~14k

About GPT-Relay-Codex-Plugin-

GPT Relay Codex Plugin 中文说明 | English details GPT Relay is a Codex plugin that relays prompts from Codex to ChatGPT through your existing Chrome session, then returns the completed ChatGPT response, generated images, Deep Research reports, and conversation links back to Codex.

GPT-Relay-Codex-Plugin- alternative? Top 1 similar tools

Looking for a GPT-Relay-Codex-Plugin- alternative? If you're comparing GPT-Relay-Codex-Plugin- with other codex skill tools, these 1 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • theorist by blader · ⭐ 191

    A Codex/Claude skill that maintains per-repo operating theory documents.

More Codex Skill Tools

Explore other popular codex skill tools:

View all Codex Skill tools →

Popular JavaScript Agent Tools

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Codex Skill tools