by TypeLLM · LLM Plugin · ★ 33
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 33 |
| Forks | 1 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | LLM Plugin |
| License | Apache-2.0 |
| Quality Score | 60/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-09-28 |
| Created | 2026-09-22 |
| Platforms | python |
| Est. Tokens | ~4k |
Permutation Invariant Jev
These tools work well together with pijev for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a pijev alternative? If you're comparing pijev with other llm plugin tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
The pipe layer of an AI nervous system — one interface connecting provider neurons to your application, across
TypeSafe Jev as a decision layer for the Pi coding agent: a measured tool-call gate plus jev_ask for typed, ca
Rust CLI powered by Jev from TypeSafe.ai that ranks agent skills for the next step using live session context.
Auto mode for every coding agent, built on Jev: risk-scores every tool call with session context (deny / ask /
A collection of skills for AI agents (Kiro, Cursor, Windsurf, Claude Code, and others). Each skill is a reusab
Submit Forma <https://joinforma.com> benefit claims from the command line and Model Context Protocol (MCP) cli
Explore other popular llm plugin tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: