jev-guard — security grade SAFE, quality 68/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 68/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by leepokai · Codex Skill · ★ 56

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is jev-guard safe to install? View the security audit →

About jev-guard

jev-guard A security hook for coding agents, powered by Jev. Auto mode, for every coding agent Claude Code's auto mode is described as: "A separate classifier model reviews actions before they run, blocking anything that escalates beyond your request, targets unrecognized infrastructure, or appears driven by hostile content Claude read." That is exactly the job jev-guard does — as three typed questions to Jev (, , ) instead of a proprietary classifier — and it does it for Codex, Copilot, Gemini, Cursor, pi, OpenCode and ACP editors too, with the same policy and the same session memory everywhere. If you want auto mode outside Claude Code, or a second

ai-agentsclaude-codecodexcursorgemini-clihooksjevopencodeprompt-injectionsecurity

Quick Facts

Stars56
Forks8
LanguageJavaScript
CategoryCodex Skill
LicenseMIT
Quality Score68.4977398091511/100
Last Updated2026-10-02
Created2026-09-17
Platformsclaude-code, cli, codex, gemini, node
Est. Tokens~17k

jev-guard alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a jev-guard alternative? If you're comparing jev-guard with other codex skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • jev-review by NiazMorshed2007 · ⭐ 233

    Local-first MCP plugin for continuous software-quality review by AI coding agents, powered by Jev.

  • agent-skills by jdrhyne · ⭐ 241

    A collection of AI agent skills for Clawdbot, Claude Code, Codex

  • rampart by peg · ⭐ 83

    Open-source firewall for AI agents. Policy engine that audits and controls what OpenClaw, Claude Code, Cursor,

  • agent-designer by appautomaton · ⭐ 130

    Portable SKILLs workspace for Claude Code, Codex, and Gemini — issue-driven workflows and cross-agent collabor

  • flowlens-mcp-server by magentic · ⭐ 110

    FlowLens is an open-source MCP server that gives your coding agent (Claude Code, Cursor, Copilot, Codex) full

  • skills by fabricioctelles · ⭐ 99

    A collection of skills for AI agents (Kiro, Cursor, Windsurf, Claude Code, and others). Each skill is a reusab

More Codex Skill Tools

Explore other popular codex skill tools:

View all Codex Skill tools →

Popular JavaScript Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is jev-guard?

jev-guard is Auto mode for every coding agent, built on Jev: risk-scores every tool call with session context (deny / ask / allow), flags prompt injection in results, checks skills and plugins. Claude Code, Codex,. It is categorized as a Codex Skill with 56 GitHub stars.

What programming language is jev-guard written in?

jev-guard is primarily written in JavaScript. It covers topics such as ai-agents, claude-code, codex.

How do I install or use jev-guard?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the jev-guard GitHub repository at github.com/leepokai/jev-guard. The project has 56 stars and 8 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does jev-guard use?

jev-guard is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to jev-guard?

The top alternatives to jev-guard on Agent Skills Hub include jev-review, agent-skills, rampart. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Codex Skill tools