claude-lane-stack — security grade SAFE, quality 65/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 65/100

Flagged: sudo usage. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by VKirill · Codex Skill · ★ 116

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is claude-lane-stack safe to install? View the security audit →

About claude-lane-stack

🏭 Claude Lane Stack A small AI coding factory for one person · v1.5.2 Multi-agent orchestration for Claude Code — you talk to one AI project manager, it runs durable Grok work through acceptance, merges finished code to , and sends independent review/fixes through the night shift. No five chats. No manual merges. 🌍 README: Русский · 简体中文 · 日本語 · Español · Deutsch · Français · 한국어 · Português 🐣 Beginner guide: EN · RU · 中文 · [日本語](doc

agentic-codingagentic-workflowai-agentsai-codingautomationclaudeclaude-codecodexdeveloper-toolsgit-worktree

Quick Facts

Stars116
Forks0
LanguagePython
CategoryCodex Skill
LicenseMIT
Quality Score64.6194232662498/100
Open Issues1
Last Updated2026-09-20
Created2026-07-11
Platformsclaude-code, codex, python
Est. Tokens~18k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with claude-lane-stack for enhanced workflows:

  • bernstein — semantic(0.35)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (62%)
  • qoreon — semantic(0.34)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (62%)

claude-lane-stack alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a claude-lane-stack alternative? If you're comparing claude-lane-stack with other codex skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • hcom by aannoo · ⭐ 490

    Let AI agents message, watch, and spawn each other across terminals. Claude Code, Codex, Antigravity CLI, Curs

  • sub-agents-mcp by shinpr · ⭐ 98

    Define task-specific AI sub-agents in Markdown for any MCP-compatible tool.

  • intellegix-code-agent-toolkit by intellegix · ⭐ 57

    Automated loop driver, slash commands, council automation, MCP browser bridge, and portfolio governance for Cl

  • smart-ralph by tzachbon · ⭐ 544

    Spec-driven development with smart compaction. Claude Code plugin combining Ralph Wiggum loop with structured

  • sandboxed.sh by Th0rgal · ⭐ 513

    Safe runtime for autonomous on-chain AI agents: isolated sandboxes, Library skills, encrypted secrets.

  • maestro-gemini by josstei · ⭐ 259

    Multi-agent orchestration extension for Gemini CLI — 22 specialists, parallel subagents, persistent sessions,

More Codex Skill Tools

Explore other popular codex skill tools:

View all Codex Skill tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is claude-lane-stack?

claude-lane-stack is Multi-agent AI coding factory for one person — Claude Code PM + Codex/Qwen/Grok/Kimi/AGY writers, durable conveyor, auto-merge to main. It is categorized as a Codex Skill with 116 GitHub stars.

What programming language is claude-lane-stack written in?

claude-lane-stack is primarily written in Python. It covers topics such as agentic-coding, agentic-workflow, ai-agents.

How do I install or use claude-lane-stack?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the claude-lane-stack GitHub repository at github.com/VKirill/claude-lane-stack. The project has 116 stars and 0 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does claude-lane-stack use?

claude-lane-stack is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to claude-lane-stack?

The top alternatives to claude-lane-stack on Agent Skills Hub include hcom, sub-agents-mcp, intellegix-code-agent-toolkit. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Codex Skill tools